The fastest Top 50 Slowest Top 50 The most powerful Top 50 The weakest Top 50 0-100 km / h maximum Top 50 0-100 km / h minimum Top 50

Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (minimum) Top 50

Large width cars Top 50 Narrow cars Top 50 Long cars Top 50 Short cars Top 50 High automobiles Top 50 low cars Top 50 Heavy cars Top 50 Lightweight cars Top 50 High ground clearance Top 50 Low ground clearance Top 50

Fuel tank maximum Top 50 The volume of the fuel tank minimum Top 50 Maximum amount of trunk Top 50 Trunk volume minimum Top 50

Compare cars — 0

main page Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway Ford Expedition II 5.4 AT 5 door SUV 2003

2002 - 2006Add to compare

Comparison with other models Ford

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 13.9 l.

Ford Torino III Sedan 4.1 MT 13.9 l.

Ford Country Squire IV 5-door station wagon 3.7 MT 13.9 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 13.9 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars

Chevrolet Tahoe II 5 door SUV 5.3 AT 13.9 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe II 5 door SUV 5.3 AT 13.9 l.

Chevrolet TrailBlazer I Facelift 5 door SUV 6.0 AT 13.9 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 13.9 l.

Toyota Sequoia I Facelift 5 door SUV 4.7 AT 13.9 l.

Toyota Sequoia I 5 door SUV 4.7 AT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Roadster 5.0 AT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Roadster 5.0 MT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Roadster 5.0 MT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Coupe 5.0 AT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Coupe 5.0 MT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Coupe 5.0 MT 13.9 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Coupe 5.0 MT 13.9 l.

Lincoln Navigator II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 13.9 l.

Ford Torino III Sedan 4.1 MT 13.9 l.

Ford Country Squire IV 5-door station wagon 3.7 MT 13.9 l.

Toyota Sequoia II Facelift 5 door SUV 5.7 AT 13.9 l.

Dodge Custom Royal I Sedan hardtop 4.4 MT 13.9 l.

Dodge Custom Royal I Coupe hardtop 4.4 MT 13.9 l.

Dodge Custom Royal I Coupe hardtop 4.4 MT 13.9 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 13.9 l.

Dodge Custom Royal I Sedan 4.4 MT 13.9 l.

Dodge Custom Royal I Cabriolet 4.4 MT 13.9 l.

Dodge Custom Royal I Cabriolet 4.4 MT 13.9 l.

Lincoln Navigator II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 13.9 l.

Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit Mark IV Sedan 6.8 AT 13.9 l.

Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit Mark III Sedan 6.8 AT 13.9 l.

Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit Mark II Sedan 6.8 AT 13.9 l.

AMC Rambler Classic Sedan 4.1 AT 13.9 l.

Dodge Polara IV Sedan 5.2 MT 13.9 l.

Dodge Polara IV Sedan 5.9 AT 13.9 l.

	main page Compare cars
Speed and acceleration	Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum	Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance	Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance	Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum

Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0473 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts

You can not add more than 3 modifications!