Compare cars — 0
main page Volvo S80 II Sedan 2.5 AT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Volvo S80 II 2.5 AT Sedan 2006

2006 - 2010Add to compare
Comparison with other models Volvo
Volvo S80 II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC90 I 5 door SUV 2.5 MT 15.2 l.

Volvo S80 II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo S80 II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I Facelift 5 door SUV Summum 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I Facelift 5 door SUV R-Design 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I 5 door SUV Summum 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo XC60 I 5 door SUV Ocean Race 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo S80 II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift Sedan 2.4 MT 15.2 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.4 MT 15.2 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Sedan 2.4 AT 15.2 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Sedan 2.4 MT 15.2 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) 5-door station wagon 2.4 AT 15.2 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) 5-door station wagon 2.4 MT 15.2 l.

BMW M5 II (E34) Sedan 3.8 MT 15.2 l.

Ford Explorer IV 5 door SUV 4.0 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Liftbek 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Ford Probe I Coupe 3.0 MT 15.2 l.

Kia Magentis II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Magentis I Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Magentis I Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Optima II Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Optima II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Volvo S80 II Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Optima I Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Optima I Sedan 2.4 AT 15.2 l.

Kia Optima I Sedan 2.5 AT 15.2 l.

Mazda 6 I (GG) 5-door station wagon 2.3 AT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse III (W211, S211) Facelift 5-door station wagon 240 2.6 MT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse III (W211, S211) 5-door station wagon 240 2.6 MT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Facelift Sedan 320 3.2 AT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse I (W124) 5-door station wagon 300 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) 3 door SUV 250 2.5d MT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) 5 door SUV 250 2.5d MT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz M-klasse II (W164) 5 door SUV 350 3.5 AT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz W124 5-door station wagon 300 3.0 MT 15.2 l.

Mercedes-Benz W124 5-door station wagon 300 3.0 MT 15.2 l.

Mitsubishi Space Wagon III Kompaktven 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Nissan 370Z I Coupe 3.7 AT 15.2 l.

Opel Omega A Sedan 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Opel Omega A 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 15.2 l.

Opel Omega A 5-door station wagon KAT 3.0 MT 15.2 l.

Opel Senator B Sedan KAT 3.0 AT 15.2 l.

Porsche Boxster II (987) Roadster S 3.2 AT 15.2 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0578 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!