The fastest Top 50 Slowest Top 50 The most powerful Top 50 The weakest Top 50 0-100 km / h maximum Top 50 0-100 km / h minimum Top 50

Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (minimum) Top 50

Large width cars Top 50 Narrow cars Top 50 Long cars Top 50 Short cars Top 50 High automobiles Top 50 low cars Top 50 Heavy cars Top 50 Lightweight cars Top 50 High ground clearance Top 50 Low ground clearance Top 50

Fuel tank maximum Top 50 The volume of the fuel tank minimum Top 50 Maximum amount of trunk Top 50 Trunk volume minimum Top 50

Compare cars — 0

main page SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city SsangYong Rodius I Facelift 3.2 AT Minivan 2007

2007 - 2013Add to compare

Comparison with other models SsangYong

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan S32A01 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars

Audi A8 II (D3) Facelift 2 Sedan Long 6.0 AT 20.5 l.

Audi A8 II (D3) Facelift Sedan Long 6.0 AT 20.5 l.

Audi A8 II (D3) Sedan Long 6.0 AT 20.5 l.

Audi R8 I Facelift Coupe V10 5.2 AT 20.5 l.

Audi R8 I Facelift Roadster V10 5.2 AT 20.5 l.

BMW 7er IV (E65/E66) Sedan 760Li 6.0 AT 20.5 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV 5.0 AT 20.5 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) 5-door station wagon 420 4.2 AT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

Toyota Mark II VIII (X100) 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 20.5 l.

Toyota Mark II VIII (X100) 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 20.5 l.

Lamborghini Gallardo I Facelift Roadster LP570-4 5.2 AT 20.5 l.

Hyundai Terracan I 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 20.5 l.

Rolls-Royce Ghost Sedan 6.6 AT 20.5 l.

Venturi 400 GT Coupe 3.0 MT 20.5 l.

Ford Torino III Coupe hardtop 4.9 MT 20.5 l.

Ford Torino III Sedan 4.9 MT 20.5 l.

Ford Torino I Cabriolet 4.7 MT 20.5 l.

Ford Country Squire IV 5-door station wagon 5.1 MT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

Hyundai Terracan I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 20.5 l.

Hyundai Terracan I 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 20.5 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV HSE Dynamic 5.0 AT 20.5 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) 5-door station wagon 4.2 AT 20.5 l.

SsangYong Rodius I Facelift Minivan S32A01 3.2 AT 20.5 l.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) Facelift 5 door SUV SRT-8 6.4 AT 20.5 l.

Jeep Grand Cherokee IV (WK2) 5 door SUV 6.4 AT 20.5 l.

Rolls-Royce Ghost I Sedan Ghost 6.6 AT 20.5 l.

Venturi 400 GT Coupe 3.0 MT 20.5 l.

	main page Compare cars
Speed and acceleration	Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum	Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance	Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance	Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum

Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0322 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts

You can not add more than 3 modifications!