Compare cars — 0
main page Opel Omega B Facelift Sedan 2.6 AT Fuel consumption on the highway
Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway Opel Omega B Facelift 2.6 AT Sedan 1999

1999 - 2004Add to compare
Comparison with other models Opel
Opel Frontera A 5 door SUV 2.5d MT 8.6 l.

Opel Insignia OPC I 5-door station wagon 2.8 MT 8.6 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift Sedan 2.6 AT 8.6 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 8.6 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 AT 8.6 l.

Opel Frontera A 5 door SUV 2.5 MT 8.6 l.

Opel Vivaro A Facelift Van 2.0 MT 8.6 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift Sedan 2.6 AT 8.6 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi A6 allroad II (C6) 5-door station wagon 4.2 AT 8.6 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift Sedan 3.0 AT 8.6 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift Sedan 3.0 MT 8.6 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 AT 8.6 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 8.6 l.

Audi A8 II (D3) Facelift Sedan 3.7 AT 8.6 l.

Audi A8 II (D3) Sedan 3.7 AT 8.6 l.

Audi R8 I Facelift Coupe V10 plus 5.2 AT 8.6 l.

Audi R8 I Facelift Roadster V8 4.2 AT 8.6 l.

BMW 6er II (E63/E64) Facelift Coupe 650i 4.8 MT 8.6 l.

BMW 6er II (E63/E64) Coupe 645i 4.4 AT 8.6 l.

BMW 6er II (E63/E64) Coupe 645i 4.4 MT 8.6 l.

BMW 6er II (E63/E64) Coupe 650i 4.8 AT 8.6 l.

BMW 6er II (E63/E64) Coupe 650i 4.8 MT 8.6 l.

BMW 7er IV (E65/E66) Sedan 745Li 4.4 AT 8.6 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 745i 3.4 MT 8.6 l.

BMW Z4 M Coupe 3.3 MT 8.6 l.

BMW Z4 M Roadster 3.3 MT 8.6 l.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Cabriolet 3.4 AT 8.6 l.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Coupe 3.8 MT 8.6 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift Sedan 2.6 AT 8.6 l.

Chevrolet Equinox I 5 door SUV 3.4 AT 8.6 l.

Chevrolet Equinox I 5 door SUV 3.4 AT 8.6 l.

Citroen Xantia I Facelift Liftbek 2.0 MT 8.6 l.

Ford Galaxy I Facelift Minivan 2.3 AT 8.6 l.

Honda CR-V I 5 door SUV 2.0 MT 8.6 l.

Kia Carnival II Minivan 2.7 AT 8.6 l.

Kia Sorento I 5 door SUV 2.4 MT 8.6 l.

Land Rover Defender 3 door SUV 90 2.4d MT 8.6 l.

Land Rover Freelander II 5 door SUV 3.2 AT 8.6 l.

Land Rover Freelander I 3 door SUV 1.8 MT 8.6 l.

Land Rover Freelander I 5 door SUV 1.8 MT 8.6 l.

Lexus GS III Sedan 430 4.3 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse AMG II (W203) Sedan 32 AMG 3.2 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse AMG II (W203) 3 doors Hatchback 32 AMG 3.2 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse AMG II (W203) 5-door station wagon 32 AMG 3.2 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz CLK-klasse II (W209) Facelift Cabriolet 500 5.0 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz CLK-klasse II (W209) Cabriolet 500 5.0 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Facelift 5-door station wagon 280 2.8 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Facelift 5-door station wagon 430 4.3 AT 8.6 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) 5-door station wagon 430 4.3 AT 8.6 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0311 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!