Compare cars — 0
main page Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe 3.8 AT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Nissan GT-R I Facelift 3.8 AT Coupe 2011

2010 - 2014Add to compare
Comparison with other models Nissan
Nissan GT-R I Facelift 2 Coupe 3.8 AT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe 3.8 AT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift 3 Coupe Black Edition 3.8 AMT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift 3 Coupe Prestige 3.8 AMT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift 2 Coupe Black Edition 3.8 AMT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift 2 Coupe Premium Edition 3.8 AMT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe Black Edition 3.8 AMT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe Premium Edition 3.8 AMT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe 3.8 AT 16.9 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi A8 I (D2) Facelift Sedan 3.7 AT 16.9 l.

Audi A8 I (D2) Sedan 3.7 AT 16.9 l.

BMW 5er VI (F10/F11/F07) 5-door Hatchback 550i xDrive 4.4 AT 16.9 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift Sedan 535i 3.5 MT 16.9 l.

BMW 7er IV (E65/E66) Facelift Sedan 750i 4.8 AT 16.9 l.

BMW 7er IV (E65/E66) Facelift Sedan 750Li 4.8 AT 16.9 l.

BMW M3 II (E36) Sedan 3.2 MT 16.9 l.

BMW M3 II (E36) Coupe 3.2 MT 16.9 l.

BMW X5 II (E70) 5 door SUV 48i 4.8 AT 16.9 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C6 Cabriolet 6.0 MT 16.9 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C6 Coupe 6.0 AT 16.9 l.

Lexus RX II Facelift 5 door SUV 300 3.0 AT 16.9 l.

Lexus RX II 5 door SUV 300 3.0 AT 16.9 l.

Lexus RX II 5 door SUV 300 3.0 AT 16.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse III (W211, S211) Facelift Sedan 500 5.5 AT 16.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse I (W124) Sedan 500 5.0 AT 16.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz S-klasse V (W221) Facelift Sedan 450 4.7 AT 16.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz S-klasse V (W221) Sedan 450 4.7 AT 16.9 l.

Mitsubishi Montero III 3 door SUV 3.5 MT 16.9 l.

Mitsubishi Montero III 5 door SUV 3.5 MT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe 3.8 AT 16.9 l.

Nissan GT-R I Facelift Coupe 3.8 AT 16.9 l.

Opel Insignia I Sedan 2.8 MT 16.9 l.

Opel Insignia I Liftbek 2.8 MT 16.9 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 AT 16.9 l.

Opel Omega B Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.2 AT 16.9 l.

Toyota 4Runner II 3 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.9 l.

Volvo V70 I 5-door station wagon 2.0 AT 16.9 l.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan 3.2 MT 16.9 l.

Alfa Romeo Spider III Cabriolet 3.2 MT 16.9 l.

Jaguar XFR I Facelift Sedan S 5.0 AT 16.9 l.

Jaguar XJ IV (X351) Sedan 5.0 AT 16.9 l.

Jaguar XJ IV (X351) Sedan Long 5.0 AT 16.9 l.

Jaguar XJR IV (X351) Sedan 5.0 AT 16.9 l.

Jaguar XJR IV (X351) Sedan Long 5.0 AT 16.9 l.

Saab 9-3 II Sedan 2.8 AT 16.9 l.

Saab 9-3 II Facelift Sedan 2.8 AT 16.9 l.

Daewoo Musso 5 door SUV 3.2 MT 16.9 l.

Kia Opirus Sedan 3.5 AT 16.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz Maybach S-klasse Sedan 600 6.0 AT 16.9 l.

Peugeot 605 Sedan 3.0 AT 16.9 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0744 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!