Compare cars — 0
main page Mazda Roadster II (NB) Roadster 1.8 MT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Mazda Roadster II (NB) 1.8 MT Roadster 1998

1998 - 2005Add to compare
Comparison with other models Mazda
Mazda 6 I (GG) Sedan 2.0 AT 11.9 l.

Mazda MX-5 II (NB) Facelift Roadster 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Mazda Roadster II (NB) Roadster 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Mazda Roadster II (NB) Roadster 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan 2.0 MT 11.9 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.8 AT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.8 AT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 1.8 AT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 1.8 AT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) 5-door Hatchback 1.8 AT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) 5-door Hatchback 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) 3 doors Hatchback 1.8 AT 11.9 l.

Audi A3 I (8L) 3 doors Hatchback 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) Cabriolet 3.0d AT 11.9 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 3.0d AT 11.9 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 3.0d MT 11.9 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) 5-door station wagon 2.5d CVT 11.9 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) Facelift Coupe 330d 3.0d AT 11.9 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) Facelift Sedan 330xd 3.0d AT 11.9 l.

Mazda Roadster II (NB) Roadster 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

BMW 4er Cabriolet 435i xDrive 3.0 MT 11.9 l.

BMW 5er VI (F10/F11/F07) Sedan 535i 3.0 AT 11.9 l.

BMW 5er VI (F10/F11/F07) 5-door station wagon 535i 3.0 AT 11.9 l.

BMW 5er VI (F10/F11/F07) 5-door station wagon 535i 3.0 MT 11.9 l.

BMW 6er III (F06/F13/F12) Facelift Sedan 650i 4.4 AT 11.9 l.

BMW 6er III (F06/F13/F12) Sedan 650i 4.4 AT 11.9 l.

BMW 7er V (F01/F02/F04) Facelift Sedan 750Li 4.4 AT 11.9 l.

BMW M3 I (E30) Coupe 2.3 MT 11.9 l.

BMW Z4 II (E89) Roadster 30i 3.0 AT 11.9 l.

Citroen Berlingo I Kompaktven 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso I Kompaktven 1.6 MT 11.9 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso I Kompaktven 1.6 MT 11.9 l.

Citroen C5 II 5-door station wagon 2.7d AT 11.9 l.

Citroen C5 I 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 11.9 l.

Citroen Xantia I Facelift 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.9 l.

Ford Mondeo II 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 11.9 l.

Ford Ranger III Half Cab Pickup 2.2d AT 11.9 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up 2.2d AT 11.9 l.

Honda Accord VIII Facelift Sedan 2.4 MT 11.9 l.

Honda Accord VIII Facelift Sedan 2.4 MT 11.9 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.9466 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!