Compare cars — 0
main page Lincoln MKZ I (Zephyr) Facelift Sedan 3.5 AT Fuel consumption on the highway
Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway Lincoln MKZ I (Zephyr) Facelift 3.5 AT Sedan 2009

2009 - 2012Add to compare
Comparison with other models Lincoln
Lincoln MKZ I (Zephyr) Facelift Sedan 3.5 AT 8.1 l.

Lincoln MKC 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.1 l.

Lincoln MKC 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.1 l.

Lincoln MKC I 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.1 l.

Lincoln MKZ I (Zephyr) Facelift Sedan 3.5 AT 8.1 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 80 V (B4) 5-door station wagon 2.6 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 2 3 doors Hatchback 3.2 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 3.0 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Facelift Sedan 4.2 AT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Facelift Sedan 4.2 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Facelift 5-door station wagon 4.2 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Sedan 3.1 AT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Sedan 3.1 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Sedan 4.2 AT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) Sedan 4.2 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 3.1 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 4.2 AT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 4.2 MT 8.1 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift Sedan 2.4 AT 8.1 l.

Audi TT I (8N) Facelift Coupe 3.2 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Cabriolet 2.0 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) Facelift 5-door station wagon 325xi 2.5 MT 8.1 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) 5-door station wagon 325xi 2.5 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) 5-door station wagon 325xi 2.5 MT 8.1 l.

Lincoln MKZ I (Zephyr) Facelift Sedan 3.5 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift Sedan 530i 3.0 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift 5-door station wagon 530i 3.0 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) 5-door station wagon 530i 3.0 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 6er II (E63/E64) Facelift Coupe 650i 4.8 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735Li 3.4 AT 8.1 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 735i 3.4 MT 8.1 l.

BMW M6 I (E24) Coupe 3.5 MT 8.1 l.

BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8 AT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Facelift Coupe 3.6 AT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Coupe 3.6 AT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C7 Stingray Coupe 6.2 MT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Equinox II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.4 AT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Equinox II 5 door SUV 2.4 AT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Monte Carlo V Coupe 3.1 AT 8.1 l.

Chevrolet Omega B Sedan 3.8 MT 8.1 l.

Ford Escape I Facelift 2 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 8.1 l.

Ford Escape I Facelift 2 5 door SUV 2.3 MT 8.1 l.

Ford Escape I Facelift 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 8.1 l.

Ford Escape I Facelift 5 door SUV 2.3 MT 8.1 l.

Ford Probe I Coupe 2.2 MT 8.1 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.1051 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!