Compare cars — 0
main page Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV HSE 3.0 AT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Land Rover Range Rover Sport II HSE 3.0 AT 5 door SUV 2013

2013 - 2017Add to compare
Comparison with other models Land Rover
Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 2 5 door SUV 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 2 5 door SUV 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II 5 door SUV 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II 5 door SUV 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 3 door SUV 6-speed 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 3 door SUV 6-speed 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 5 door SUV 6-speed 2.2d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV 3.0d AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 5 door SUV Base 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 5 door SUV X-Dynamic S 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 5 door SUV X-Dynamic SE 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 3 door SUV SE 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 3 door SUV X-Dynamic SE 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 2 5 door SUV Adventure LE 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 2 5 door SUV HSE 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 2 5 door SUV HSE 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 2 5 door SUV Metropolis LE 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV HSE 3.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV Dynamic 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV Dynamic 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV HSE 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV HSE 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Freelander II Facelift 5 door SUV S 2.2 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 3 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Defender II 3 door SUV 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV SE 3.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV HSE 3.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV Autobiography 3.0 AT 8.7 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 2 5-door Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 2 3 doors Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 2 Cabriolet 1.8 AT 8.7 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) 3 doors Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Audi A4 allroad IV (B8) 5-door station wagon 3.0d AT 8.7 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 2.0d CVT 8.7 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 2.0d MT 8.7 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 116i 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 120i 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 120i 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 2er Coupe 228i 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) Facelift 5-door station wagon 330i 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) 5-door Hatchback 320i xDrive 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) 5-door Hatchback 320i 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) 5-door station wagon 320i 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) 5-door station wagon 320i xDrive 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) Sedan 328i xDrive 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 5 door SUV HSE 3.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW 4er Liftbek 428i xDrive 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW 4er Coupe 428i xDrive 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW 4er Cabriolet 428i xDrive 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW X1 I (E84) Facelift 5 door SUV 20i 2.0 AT 8.7 l.

BMW X3 II (F25) Facelift 5 door SUV 20i xDrive 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

BMW X3 I (E83) Facelift 5 door SUV 20d 2.0d AT 8.7 l.

BMW X5 II (E70) Facelift 5 door SUV 30d 3.0d AT 8.7 l.

BMW X5 II (E70) Facelift 5 door SUV 30d 3.0d AT 8.7 l.

BMW X6 I (E71) Facelift 5 door SUV 30d 3.0d AT 8.7 l.

BMW X6 I (E71) 5 door SUV 30d 3.0d AT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Corsa 5-door station wagon 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Cruze I Facelift Sedan 1.8 MT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Cruze I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.8 MT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Cruze I Facelift 5-door station wagon 1.6 MT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Malibu IX Sedan 1.5 AT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Sonic Sedan 1.4 AT 8.7 l.

Chevrolet Sonic 5-door Hatchback 1.4 AT 8.7 l.

Citroen C4 I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.4 MT 8.7 l.

Citroen C4 I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.6 AT 8.7 l.

Citroen C4 I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 2.0 MT 8.7 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.3382 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!