Compare cars — 0
main page Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up 2.2d MT Fuel consumption on the highway
Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway Ford Ranger III 2.2d MT Double cab pick-up 2011

2011 - 2015Add to compare
Comparison with other models Ford
Ford Focus RS I 3 doors Hatchback 2.0 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Galaxy I Minivan 2.3 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Mustang VI Cabriolet 2.3 AT 7.7 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up 2.2d MT 7.7 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up Limited 2.2 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up XL 2.2 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up 2.2d MT 7.7 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan 2.3 AT 7.7 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan 2.3 AT 7.7 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) 5-door station wagon 2.3 AT 7.7 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) 5-door station wagon RS2 2.2 MT 7.7 l.

Audi S2 I 5-door station wagon 2.2 MT 7.7 l.

Audi S8 III (D4) Facelift Sedan 4.0 AT 7.7 l.

Audi TT II (8J) Coupe 3.2 AT 7.7 l.

Audi TT I (8N) Facelift Cabriolet 3.2 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift Sedan 335i xDrive 3.0 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 3er II (E30) Coupe 320i 2.0 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er VI (F10/F11/F07) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 550i xDrive 4.4 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) 5-door station wagon 525xi 2.5 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) 5-door station wagon 525xi 2.5 MT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Sedan 545i 4.4 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift Sedan 530i 3.0 MT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift 5-door station wagon 525i 2.5 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift 5-door station wagon 530i 3.0 MT 7.7 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) 5-door station wagon 530i 3.0 MT 7.7 l.

BMW 7er V (F01/F02/F04) Sedan 740Li 3.0 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735i 3.4 AT 7.7 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up 2.2d MT 7.7 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735Li 3.4 MT 7.7 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 735i 3.4 AT 7.7 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 735i 3.4 MT 7.7 l.

BMW M3 II (E36) Cabriolet 3.2 MT 7.7 l.

BMW X3 I (E83) Facelift 5 door SUV 25i 2.5 MT 7.7 l.

BMW X3 I (E83) Facelift 5 door SUV 30i 3.0 MT 7.7 l.

BMW X6 II (F16) 5 door SUV 50i 4.4 AT 7.7 l.

Chevrolet Impala X Sedan 3.6 AT 7.7 l.

Citroen C5 I 5-door station wagon 3.0 AT 7.7 l.

Citroen Xantia I Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 7.7 l.

Daewoo Nexia I Facelift Sedan 1.5 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Focus RS I 3 doors Hatchback 2.0 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Galaxy I Minivan 2.3 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 7.7 l.

Ford Mustang VI Cabriolet 2.3 AT 7.7 l.

Ford Ranger III Double cab pick-up 2.2d MT 7.7 l.

Honda Accord VII Facelift 5-door station wagon Type S 2.4 MT 7.7 l.

Honda Accord VII 5-door station wagon Type S 2.4 MT 7.7 l.

Honda CR-V II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 7.7 l.

Honda CR-V II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.0 MT 7.7 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.3246 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!