Compare cars — 0
main page Ford Ranger II Half Cab Pickup 3.0d MT Fuel consumption average
Fuel consumption average

Fuel consumption average Ford Ranger II 3.0d MT Half Cab Pickup 2006

2006 - 2009Add to compare
Comparison with other models Ford
Ford Capri III Coupe 2.0 MT 9.2 l.

Ford Ranger II Half Cab Pickup 3.0d MT 9.2 l.

Ford Ranger II Double cab pick-up 3.0d MT 9.2 l.

Ford Telstar II Sedan 1.8 AT 9.2 l.

Ford Laser I 5-door Hatchback 1.5 MT 9.2 l.

Ford Laser I 5-door Hatchback 1.5 MT 9.2 l.

Ford Laser I 3 doors Hatchback 1.5 MT 9.2 l.

Ford Laser I 3 doors Hatchback 1.5 MT 9.2 l.

Ford Telstar II 5-door station wagon 1.8 AT 9.2 l.

Ford Ranger II Half Cab Pickup 3.0d MT 9.2 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan 2.6 AT 9.2 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan 2.8 AT 9.2 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) 5-door station wagon 2.6 AT 9.2 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) 5-door station wagon 2.8 AT 9.2 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Facelift Sedan 2.4 MT 9.2 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Sedan 2.4 MT 9.2 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) 5-door station wagon 2.3 MT 9.2 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) Sedan 2.3 MT 9.2 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) Sedan 2.3 MT 9.2 l.

Audi 80 II (B1) Sedan 1.6 MT 9.2 l.

Audi 90 II (B3) Sedan 2.3 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift Sedan Long 3.2 AT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Sedan 3.2 AT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Sedan 3.2 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) Sedan 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 1.8 CVT 9.2 l.

Ford Ranger II Half Cab Pickup 3.0d MT 9.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A6 I (C4) Sedan 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A6 I (C4) 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 9.2 l.

Audi A8 III (D4) Facelift Sedan Long 4.0 AT 9.2 l.

Audi Coupe II (B3) Facelift Coupe 2.3 MT 9.2 l.

Audi Coupe II (B3) Facelift Coupe 2.6 MT 9.2 l.

Audi Coupe II (B3) Coupe 2.3 MT 9.2 l.

Audi Coupe I (B2) Coupe 1.9 MT 9.2 l.

Audi Q7 I Facelift 5 door SUV 4.1d AT 9.2 l.

Audi S2 I 5-door station wagon 2.2 MT 9.2 l.

Audi S6 IV (C7) Facelift Sedan 4.0 AT 9.2 l.

Audi TT RS II (8J) Coupe 2.5 MT 9.2 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Coupe 135i 3.0 AT 9.2 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Coupe 135i 3.0 MT 9.2 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 130i 3.0 MT 9.2 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift 5-door Hatchback 130i 3.0 MT 9.2 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 130i 3.0 AT 9.2 l.

BMW 1er I (E87) 5-door Hatchback 130i 3.0 MT 9.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift 5-door station wagon 335i xDrive 3.0 AT 9.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Sedan 325xi 2.5 AT 9.2 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0897 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!