The fastest Top 50 Slowest Top 50 The most powerful Top 50 The weakest Top 50 0-100 km / h maximum Top 50 0-100 km / h minimum Top 50

Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (minimum) Top 50

Large width cars Top 50 Narrow cars Top 50 Long cars Top 50 Short cars Top 50 High automobiles Top 50 low cars Top 50 Heavy cars Top 50 Lightweight cars Top 50 High ground clearance Top 50 Low ground clearance Top 50

Fuel tank maximum Top 50 The volume of the fuel tank minimum Top 50 Maximum amount of trunk Top 50 Trunk volume minimum Top 50

Compare cars — 0

main page Ford Ranger IV Half Cab Pickup 2.2d MT Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Ford Ranger IV 2.2d MT Half Cab Pickup 2015

2015 - 2019Add to compare

Comparison with other models Ford

Ford C-MAX II Kompaktven Grand 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford C-MAX II Kompaktven Grand 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Escort IV 5-door Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Escort IV 3 doors Hatchback 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Galaxy II Minivan 2.0d AT 8.2 l.

Ford Galaxy II Minivan 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.2d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.2d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Liftbek 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Liftbek 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 2.0d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Ranger IV Half Cab Pickup 2.2d MT 8.2 l.

Ford S-MAX I Facelift Minivan 2.2d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Ranger IV Half Cab Pickup 2.2d MT 8.2 l.

Ford Fiesta Mk7 3 doors Hatchback 1.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo IV Facelift 5-door station wagon 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo IV Facelift Liftbek 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo IV Facelift Sedan 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Ford Ranger IV Double cab pick-up 2.2 MT 8.2 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars

Audi A3 III (8V) Sedan 1.8 AT 8.2 l.

Audi A3 III (8V) 5-door Hatchback 1.8 AT 8.2 l.

Audi A3 III (8V) 3 doors Hatchback 1.8 AT 8.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift Sedan 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift Sedan Long 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Audi Q7 I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0d AT 8.2 l.

Audi TT III (8S) Coupe 2.0 AT 8.2 l.

BMW 1er II (F20-F21) 5-door Hatchback 125i 2.0 AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) 5-door Hatchback 320i 2.0 AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) Sedan 328i 2.0 AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) Sedan 320i 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift Cabriolet 325d 3.0d AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift Cabriolet 330d 3.0d AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift 5-door station wagon 325d 3.0d AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Cabriolet 330d 3.0d AT 8.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) 5-door station wagon 325d 3.0d AT 8.2 l.

BMW 4er Liftbek 420i 2.0 AT 8.2 l.

BMW 4er Liftbek 428i 2.0 AT 8.2 l.

Ford Ranger IV Half Cab Pickup 2.2d MT 8.2 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) 5-door station wagon 530d 3.0d MT 8.2 l.

Chevrolet Spark III 5-door Hatchback 1.0 AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C3 I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.4 MT 8.2 l.

Citroen C3 I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.4 MT 8.2 l.

Citroen C4 II 5-door Hatchback 1.4 MT 8.2 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso II Kompaktven 1.6 AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso II Kompaktven 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso II Kompaktven Grand 1.6 AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso II Kompaktven Grand 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

Citroen C5 II Sedan 2.0d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C5 II 5-door station wagon 2.2d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C5 II 5-door station wagon CrossTourer 2.0d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C5 II 5-door station wagon CrossTourer 2.0d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C5 II 5-door station wagon CrossTourer 2.2d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen C5 I Facelift Liftbek 2.2d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen XM II 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 8.2 l.

Citroen Xsara 5-door Hatchback 2.0d AT 8.2 l.

Citroen Xsara 3 doors Hatchback 2.0d AT 8.2 l.

Daewoo Nexia I Sedan 1.5 MT 8.2 l.

Ford C-MAX II Kompaktven Grand 1.6 MT 8.2 l.

	main page Compare cars
Speed and acceleration	Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum	Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance	Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance	Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum

Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0511 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts

You can not add more than 3 modifications!