Compare cars — 0
main page Ford Mustang III Facelift Cabriolet 2.3 MT Fuel consumption on the highway
Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway Ford Mustang III Facelift 2.3 MT Cabriolet 1987

1986 - 1993Add to compare
Comparison with other models Ford
Ford Edge I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.7 AT 9 l.

Ford Explorer V Facelift 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) II Sedan 2.5 AT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Coupe 4.6 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe Boss 302 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang IV Facelift Cabriolet 4.6 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Coupe 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Cabriolet 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Facelift Cabriolet 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Cabriolet 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Cabriolet 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Edge II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.7 AT 9 l.

Ford Escape II 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Explorer V Facelift 2 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Explorer VI 5 door SUV 3.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) II Facelift Sedan 2.7 AT 9 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) II Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 9 l.

Ford F-150 XIV Double cab pick-up 3.5 AT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Facelift Cabriolet 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford LTD Crown Victoria Sedan 4.9 AT 9 l.

Ford LTD Crown Victoria Sedan 4.9 AT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Coupe 4.6 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang VI Facelift Cabriolet 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Ranger IV Double cab pick-up 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Ranger IV Half Cab Pickup 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Thunderbird IX (Aero Birds) Coupe 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford Thunderbird IX (Aero Birds) Coupe 3.8 AT 9 l.

Ford Transit Connect II Facelift Kompaktven 2.5 AT 9 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) I Facelift Sedan 3.0 AT 9 l.

Ford F-150 XIV Double cab pick-up 3.5 AT 9 l.

Ford Ranger T6 Facelift 2 Half Cab Pickup 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Ranger T6 Facelift 2 Double cab pick-up 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Transit Connect II Facelift Kompaktven 2.5 AT 9 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 III (C3) Facelift Sedan 2.2 AT 9 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.2 AT 9 l.

Audi RS4 I (B5) 5-door station wagon 2.7 MT 9 l.

Audi S4 I (B5) Sedan 2.7 MT 9 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Facelift Sedan 535i 3.0 MT 9 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Facelift Sedan 540i 4.4 AT 9 l.

BMW 5er III (E34) 5-door station wagon 530i 3.0 AT 9 l.

BMW 5er III (E34) 5-door station wagon 530i 3.0 MT 9 l.

BMW M3 IV (E9x) Sedan 4.0 AT 9 l.

BMW M3 IV (E9x) Coupe 4.0 AT 9 l.

BMW M3 IV (E9x) Coupe 4.0 AT 9 l.

BMW X5 M II (F85) 5 door SUV 4.4 AT 9 l.

BMW X6 M II (F86) 5 door SUV 4.4 AT 9 l.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift Coupe 5.7 AT 9 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C6 Coupe 6.2 MT 9 l.

Chevrolet Malibu VII Sedan 3.6 AT 9 l.

Citroen C8 I Facelift Minivan 3.0 AT 9 l.

Citroen C8 I Minivan 3.0 AT 9 l.

Citroen C8 I Minivan 3.0 AT 9 l.

Citroen XM II 5-door station wagon 2.0 AT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Facelift Cabriolet 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford Explorer V Facelift 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 9 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) II Sedan 2.5 AT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Coupe 4.6 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe Boss 302 5.0 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang IV Facelift Cabriolet 4.6 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Coupe 2.3 MT 9 l.

Ford Mustang III Cabriolet 2.3 MT 9 l.

Honda Accord VII Coupe 2.4 AT 9 l.

Honda Element I 5 door SUV 2.4 AT 9 l.

Honda Element I 5 door SUV 2.4 AT 9 l.

Honda Element I 5 door SUV 2.4 MT 9 l.

Honda Element I 5 door SUV 2.4 MT 9 l.

Honda Odyssey (North America) I Minivan 2.2 AT 9 l.

Honda Odyssey I Kompaktven 2.2 AT 9 l.

Hyundai Avante III Facelift Sedan 2.0 AT 9 l.

Hyundai Genesis II Sedan 3.0 AT 9 l.

Hyundai Grandeur III Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 9 l.

Hyundai Grandeur I Sedan 2.0 AT 9 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.1471 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!