The fastest Top 50 Slowest Top 50 The most powerful Top 50 The weakest Top 50 0-100 km / h maximum Top 50 0-100 km / h minimum Top 50

Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (minimum) Top 50

Large width cars Top 50 Narrow cars Top 50 Long cars Top 50 Short cars Top 50 High automobiles Top 50 low cars Top 50 Heavy cars Top 50 Lightweight cars Top 50 High ground clearance Top 50 Low ground clearance Top 50

Fuel tank maximum Top 50 The volume of the fuel tank minimum Top 50 Maximum amount of trunk Top 50 Trunk volume minimum Top 50

Compare cars — 0

main page Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Ford Mondeo III 1.8 MT 5-door station wagon 2000

2000 - 2003Add to compare

Comparison with other models Ford

Ford Escort III 3 doors Hatchback RS 1.6 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Liftbek 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Liftbek 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford EcoSport 5 door SUV 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

Ford EcoSport I 5 door SUV Trend Plus 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

Ford EcoSport I Facelift 5 door SUV Trend 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford EcoSport I Facelift 5 door SUV Trend Plus 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford EcoSport I Facelift 5 door SUV Titanium 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford EcoSport I Facelift 5 door SUV Titanium Plus 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Ford Ranger IV Double cab pick-up 3.2 AT 11.4 l.

Ford Taunus III 2 Door Sedan 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford Taunus III Sedan 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars

Audi 100 III (C3) Facelift Sedan 2.4 MT 11.4 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Sedan 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Sedan 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Sedan 2.4 MT 11.4 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) 5-door station wagon 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

Audi 90 II (B3) Sedan 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Facelift Sedan Long 3.2 CVT 11.4 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) 5-door station wagon 3.2 CVT 11.4 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) Sedan 1.8 CVT 11.4 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 1.8 CVT 11.4 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 1.8 CVT 11.4 l.

Audi A4 I (B5) Facelift Sedan 2.5d AT 11.4 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 2.7d AT 11.4 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 3.0d AT 11.4 l.

Audi A6 III (C6) 5-door station wagon 3.0d MT 11.4 l.

Audi Q5 I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Cabriolet 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Cabriolet 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Cabriolet 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 1er I (E87/E81/E82/E88) Facelift Coupe 125i 3.0 AT 11.4 l.

Ford Mondeo III 5-door station wagon 1.8 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er VI (F3x) 5-door station wagon 335i 3.0 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift Sedan 320i 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift 5-door station wagon 320i 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift 5-door station wagon 320i 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) 5-door station wagon 320i 2.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) 5-door station wagon 320i 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) 5-door station wagon 318i 1.9 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 3er II (E30) Sedan 330xi 2.7 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 4er Coupe 435i 3.0 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 4er Cabriolet 435i 3.0 MT 11.4 l.

BMW 5er VI (F10/F11/F07) Sedan 523i 2.5 AT 11.4 l.

BMW 7er VI (G11/G12) Sedan 750i xDrive 4.4 AT 11.4 l.

BMW X5 I (E53) Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0d MT 11.4 l.

BMW X6 II (F16) 5 door SUV 35i 3.0 AT 11.4 l.

BMW Z3 Roadster 1.9 AT 11.4 l.

BMW Z3 Roadster 1.9 MT 11.4 l.

BMW Z4 I (E85/E86) Facelift Roadster 2.2 AT 11.4 l.

BMW Z4 I (E85/E86) Roadster 2.2 AT 11.4 l.

Chevrolet Epica I Facelift Sedan 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

Chevrolet Epica I Sedan 2.0 MT 11.4 l.

	main page Compare cars
Speed and acceleration	Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum	Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance	Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance	Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum

Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.1228 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts

You can not add more than 3 modifications!