The fastest Top 50 Slowest Top 50 The most powerful Top 50 The weakest Top 50 0-100 km / h maximum Top 50 0-100 km / h minimum Top 50

Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (maximum) Top 50 Fuel consumption average (minimum) Top 50

Large width cars Top 50 Narrow cars Top 50 Long cars Top 50 Short cars Top 50 High automobiles Top 50 low cars Top 50 Heavy cars Top 50 Lightweight cars Top 50 High ground clearance Top 50 Low ground clearance Top 50

Fuel tank maximum Top 50 The volume of the fuel tank minimum Top 50 Maximum amount of trunk Top 50 Trunk volume minimum Top 50

Compare cars — 0

main page Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.5 AT Fuel consumption average

Fuel consumption average

Fuel consumption average Ford Mondeo III 2.5 AT Sedan 2000

2000 - 2003Add to compare

Comparison with other models Ford

Ford Explorer V 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Explorer V 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Granada II Sedan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Granada II Sedan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Liftbek 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Ranger II Half Cab Pickup 3.0d AT 10.2 l.

Ford Ranger II Double cab pick-up 3.0d AT 10.2 l.

Ford Telstar II Sedan 1.8 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Five Hundred Sedan 3.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Five Hundred Sedan 3.0 CVT 10.2 l.

Ford Freestyle 5 door SUV 3.0 CVT 10.2 l.

Ford Spectron Minivan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Spectron Minivan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Bronco II 3 door SUV 2.8 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Edge II Facelift 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Five Hundred Sedan 3.0 CVT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Freestyle 5 door SUV 3.0 CVT 10.2 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) II Facelift Sedan 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) II Facelift Sedan 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mustang VI Facelift Coupe 2.3 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Mustang VI Facelift Coupe 2.3 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Ranger IV Double cab pick-up 2.3 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Ranger IV Half Cab Pickup 2.3 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Spectron Minivan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Spectron Minivan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Taunus III 2 Door Sedan 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Taunus III Sedan 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Telstar II 5-door station wagon 1.8 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Thunderbird IX (Aero Birds) Coupe 3.8 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Transit Connect II Van 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Transit Connect II Van 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Fusion (North America) I Facelift Sedan 3.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Ranger T6 Facelift 2 Half Cab Pickup 2.3 AT 10.2 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars

Audi 90 II (B3) Sedan 2.3 MT 10.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 10.2 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 3.0 MT 10.2 l.

Audi Coupe II (B3) Facelift Coupe 2.2 MT 10.2 l.

Audi Coupe II (B3) Facelift Coupe 2.8 MT 10.2 l.

Audi Coupe II (B3) Coupe 2.3 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift Sedan 335i xDrive 3.0 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Sedan 335i xDrive 3.0 AT 10.2 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Sedan 335i xDrive 3.0 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 5er IV (E39) Sedan 535i 3.5 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 5er III (E34) 5-door station wagon 525i 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

BMW 5er III (E34) 5-door station wagon 525i 2.5 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 7er III (E38) Facelift Sedan 735i 3.5 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 7er III (E38) Facelift Sedan 735Li 3.5 MT 10.2 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735Li 3.4 AT 10.2 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 728i 2.8 AT 10.2 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 728i 2.8 MT 10.2 l.

BMW Z3 Coupe 3.0 AT 10.2 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Coupe 3.6 MT 10.2 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C5 Coupe 5.7 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Chevrolet Equinox II 5 door SUV 2.4 AT 10.2 l.

Chevrolet Impala VIII Sedan SS 3.8 AT 10.2 l.

Chevrolet Monte Carlo VI Coupe 3.8 AT 10.2 l.

Citroen C5 I Facelift Liftbek 3.0 AT 10.2 l.

Citroen C5 I Liftbek 3.0 AT 10.2 l.

Citroen CX II 5-door Hatchback 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Citroen XM I 5-door Hatchback 3.0 MT 10.2 l.

Daewoo Korando 3 door SUV 2.3 MT 10.2 l.

Daewoo Korando SUV (open top) 2.3 AT 10.2 l.

Daewoo Korando SUV (open top) 2.3 AT 10.2 l.

Daewoo Korando SUV (open top) 2.3 MT 10.2 l.

Daewoo Korando SUV (open top) 2.3 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Explorer V 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Explorer V 5 door SUV 2.0 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Granada II Sedan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Granada II Sedan 2.0 MT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Liftbek 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

Ford Mondeo III Sedan 2.5 AT 10.2 l.

	main page Compare cars
Speed and acceleration	Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum	Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance	Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance	Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum

Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0528 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts

You can not add more than 3 modifications!