Compare cars — 0
main page Ford Focus ST III Facelift 5-door Hatchback 2.0 MT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Ford Focus ST III Facelift 2.0 MT 5-door Hatchback 2014

2015 - 2018Add to compare
Comparison with other models Ford
Ford Focus ST III Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III Facelift 5-door Hatchback 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III 5-door Hatchback 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Mondeo III Facelift Sedan 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III 5-door station wagon ST2 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III 5-door Hatchback ST1 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III 5-door Hatchback ST2 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III Facelift 5-door Hatchback 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan 2.4d MT 9.9 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) 5-door station wagon 2.4d MT 9.9 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Sedan 2.0d AT 9.9 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Sedan 2.0d MT 9.9 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) 5-door station wagon 2.0d MT 9.9 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) Sedan 1.6 AT 9.9 l.

Audi 80 V (B4) Sedan 1.6 MT 9.9 l.

Audi A3 II (8P) Facelift 2 3 doors Hatchback 2.0 AT 9.9 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Sedan 1.8 CVT 9.9 l.

Audi A4 IV (B8) Sedan 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) Sedan 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) 5-door station wagon 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Audi A4 II (B6) Sedan 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Audi A5 I Coupe 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

Audi A5 I Coupe 3.0d MT 9.9 l.

Audi A5 I Cabriolet 2.0 CVT 9.9 l.

Audi A5 I Cabriolet 2.0 CVT 9.9 l.

Audi A6 IV (C7) Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 AT 9.9 l.

Audi TT II (8J) Facelift Coupe 2.0 AT 9.9 l.

Audi TT II (8J) Facelift Coupe 2.0 AT 9.9 l.

Ford Focus ST III Facelift 5-door Hatchback 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Facelift 5-door station wagon 325i 3.0 MT 9.9 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Coupe 330i 3.0 AT 9.9 l.

BMW 3er V (E9x) Coupe 330i 3.0 MT 9.9 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) Facelift Coupe 316i 1.6 MT 9.9 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) Facelift Sedan 316i 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

BMW 3er IV (E46) Facelift Sedan 316i 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Facelift 5-door station wagon 530xd 3.0d AT 9.9 l.

BMW X1 I (E84) 5 door SUV 28i 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

BMW X3 II (F25) 5 door SUV 20i xDrive 2.0 MT 9.9 l.

Chevrolet Aveo II Sedan 1.6 AT 9.9 l.

Chevrolet Aveo II 5-door Hatchback 1.6 AT 9.9 l.

Chevrolet Captiva I Facelift 2 5 door SUV 2.0d AT 9.9 l.

Chevrolet Cobalt I Sedan 2.2 AT 9.9 l.

Chevrolet Lacetti Sedan 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

Chevrolet Lacetti 5-door Hatchback 1.8 MT 9.9 l.

Citroen C4 II Sedan 1.6 AT 9.9 l.

Citroen C4 I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 1.6 AT 9.9 l.

Citroen C4 I Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 1.6 AT 9.9 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso I Kompaktven Grand 2.0d AT 9.9 l.

Citroen C4 Picasso I Kompaktven Grand 2.0d AT 9.9 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.2338 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!