Compare cars — 0
main page Cadillac STS I Sedan 3.6 AT Fuel consumption on the highway
Fuel consumption on the highway

Fuel consumption on the highway Cadillac STS I 3.6 AT Sedan 2004

2004 - 2007Add to compare
Comparison with other models Cadillac
Cadillac CTS III Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac CTS-V I Sedan 6.0 MT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Facelift Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Facelift Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac DTS Sedan 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac DTS Sedan 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac DTS Sedan 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac DTS Sedan 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Facelift Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Facelift Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac XT5 I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.7 AT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 III (C3) Facelift Sedan 2.2 MT 9.4 l.

Audi 100 III (C3) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.2 MT 9.4 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift Sedan 4.2 AT 9.4 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift 5-door station wagon 4.2 AT 9.4 l.

Audi RS4 II (B7) 5-door station wagon 4.2 MT 9.4 l.

Audi S4 II (B6) Cabriolet 4.2 AT 9.4 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Facelift Sedan 528xi 3.0 MT 9.4 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Facelift Sedan 535xi 3.0 MT 9.4 l.

BMW M3 IV (E9x) Cabriolet 4.0 AT 9.4 l.

BMW M3 IV (E9x) Cabriolet 4.0 AT 9.4 l.

BMW M3 IV (E9x) Cabriolet 4.0 MT 9.4 l.

BMW X6 I (E71) 5 door SUV ActiveHybrid 4.4hyb AT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C5 Roadster 5.7 AT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Corvette C5 Coupe 5.7 AT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Equinox II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe III 5 door SUV 5.3 AT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Tracker I 5 door SUV 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Tracker I SUV (open top) 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Tracker I SUV (open top) 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Chevrolet Tracker I SUV (open top) 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Cadillac STS I Sedan 3.6 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Crown Victoria II Sedan 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Crown Victoria II Sedan 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Edge I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Edge I 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Escape II 5 door SUV 2.5 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Escape I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Escape I 5 door SUV 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Explorer V 5 door SUV Sport 3.5 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Explorer V 5 door SUV Sport 3.5 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Flex I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Focus (North America) I Facelift 5-door Hatchback 2.3 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Focus (North America) I Facelift 3 doors Hatchback 2.3 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Focus (North America) I 5-door Hatchback 2.3 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Focus (North America) I 3 doors Hatchback 2.3 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Focus ST I 5-door Hatchback SVT 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Focus ST I 3 doors Hatchback SVT 2.0 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Mustang V Cabriolet 4.6 MT 9.4 l.

Ford Mustang V Coupe 4.0 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Mustang V Coupe 4.6 AT 9.4 l.

Ford Mustang V Facelift Coupe 5.0 AT 9.4 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.06 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!