Compare cars — 0
main page Alfa Romeo Spider II Cabriolet 3.0 MT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Alfa Romeo Spider II 3.0 MT Cabriolet 1995

1995 - 2005Add to compare
Comparison with other models Alfa Romeo
Alfa Romeo Spider II Cabriolet 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo Spider II Cabriolet 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo GTV Coupe 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo GTV Coupe 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo GTV Coupe 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo GTV Coupe 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo Spider II Cabriolet 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
BMW 5er V (E60/E61) 5-door station wagon 545i 4.4 MT 16.8 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735i 3.4 AT 16.8 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735i 3.4 MT 16.8 l.

BMW 7er II (E32) Sedan 735Li 3.4 MT 16.8 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 735i 3.4 AT 16.8 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 735i 3.4 MT 16.8 l.

BMW 7er I (E23) Sedan 735i 3.4 MT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Avalanche I Double cab pick-up 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Avalanche I Double cab pick-up 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Avalanche I Double cab pick-up 8.1 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Facelift Coupe ZL1 6.2 MT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Facelift Cabriolet ZL1 6.2 MT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift Coupe 3.8 MT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado III (K2XX) Half Cab Pickup 6.2 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado III (K2XX) Double cab pick-up 6.2 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Single cab pickup 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Single cab pickup 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Half Cab Pickup 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Half Cab Pickup 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Half Cab Pickup 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Alfa Romeo Spider II Cabriolet 3.0 MT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Double cab pick-up 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado II (GMT900) Double cab pick-up 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado I (GMT800) Single cab pickup 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado I (GMT800) Single cab pickup 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Silverado I (GMT800) Half Cab Pickup 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet SS I Sedan 6.2 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe II 5 door SUV 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe II 5 door SUV 4.8 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe I 5 door SUV 5.7 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe I 5 door SUV 5.7 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet Tahoe I 3 door SUV 5.7 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet TrailBlazer I Facelift 5 door SUV 6.0 AT 16.8 l.

Chevrolet TrailBlazer I 5 door SUV 5.3 AT 16.8 l.

Daewoo Korando 3 door SUV 3.2 MT 16.8 l.

Ford Expedition III 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 16.8 l.

Ford Expedition III 5 door SUV EL 5.4 AT 16.8 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 4.6 AT 16.8 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 4.6 AT 16.8 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 16.8 l.

Ford Expedition II 5 door SUV 5.4 AT 16.8 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.1121 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!