Compare cars — 0
main page Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan 3.2 MT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Alfa Romeo 159 I 3.2 MT Sedan

2008 - 2010Add to compare
Comparison with other models Alfa Romeo
Alfa Romeo 159 5-door station wagon 3.2 MT 15.9 l.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan 3.2 MT 15.9 l.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan 3.2 MT 15.9 l.

Alfa Romeo 159 5-door station wagon 3.2 MT 15.9 l.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan 3.2 MT 15.9 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi A8 I (D2) Facelift Sedan 2.8 AT 15.9 l.

Audi A8 I (D2) Facelift Sedan 2.8 MT 15.9 l.

Audi A8 I (D2) Sedan 2.8 AT 15.9 l.

Audi A8 I (D2) Sedan 2.8 MT 15.9 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Facelift Sedan 550i 4.8 AT 15.9 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Sedan 550i 4.8 AT 15.9 l.

BMW 5er III (E34) Sedan 530i 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

BMW 5er III (E34) Sedan 530i 3.0 MT 15.9 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Facelift Coupe 3.6 AT 15.9 l.

Chevrolet Camaro V Coupe 3.6 AT 15.9 l.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Coupe 3.8 MT 15.9 l.

Citroen Xantia I Facelift Liftbek 3.0 MT 15.9 l.

Citroen XM II 5-door Hatchback 3.0 MT 15.9 l.

Citroen XM I 5-door Hatchback 3.0 MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) Facelift 5-door station wagon 240 2.6 MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) 5-door station wagon 240 2.6 MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) Sedan 240 2.6 MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse III (W211, S211) Facelift Sedan 240 2.6 MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse III (W211, S211) Facelift 5-door station wagon 240 2.6 AT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Facelift 5-door station wagon 280 2.8 AT 15.9 l.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan 3.2 MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Facelift Sedan 320 3.2 AT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) 5-door station wagon 280 2.8 AT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Sedan 320 3.2 AT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) 3 door SUV 300 3.0d MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) 5 door SUV 300 3.0d MT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) SUV (open top) 300 3.0d AT 15.9 l.

Mercedes-Benz SL-klasse IV (R129) Roadster 300 3.0 MT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Montero IV 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Montero IV 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV Facelift 2 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV Facelift 2 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV Facelift 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

Mitsubishi Pajero IV 5 door SUV 3.5 AT 15.9 l.

Opel Antara I Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

Peugeot 406 Coupe 2.0 AT 15.9 l.

Peugeot 406 Coupe 3.0 AT 15.9 l.

Peugeot 406 Coupe 3.0 MT 15.9 l.

Peugeot 406 Sedan 2.0 AT 15.9 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.2273 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!