Compare cars — 0
main page Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT Fuel consumption in the city
Fuel consumption in the city

Fuel consumption in the city Cadillac SRX II 3.0 AT 5 door SUV 2010

2009 - 2012Add to compare
Comparison with other models Cadillac
Cadillac CTS II Coupe 3.6 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II Facelift 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac CTS II Coupe 3.6 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV Base 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Comparison with other brands of cars
Audi 100 IV (C4) Sedan S4 2.2 AT 16.1 l.

Audi 100 IV (C4) 5-door station wagon S4 2.2 AT 16.1 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) Cabriolet 3.1 AT 16.1 l.

Audi A4 III (B7) Cabriolet 3.1 MT 16.1 l.

Audi A4 I (B5) Facelift 5-door station wagon 2.8 AT 16.1 l.

Audi A4 I (B5) 5-door station wagon 2.8 AT 16.1 l.

Audi A6 II (C5) Facelift Sedan 2.4 AT 16.1 l.

BMW 5er V (E60/E61) Facelift 5-door station wagon 550i 4.8 AT 16.1 l.

BMW 5er II (E28) Sedan 535i 3.4 MT 16.1 l.

Citroen Xantia I Facelift 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) Facelift Sedan 320 3.2 MT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) 5-door station wagon 240 2.6 AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) Sedan 320 3.2 AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz C-klasse II (W203) Sedan 320 3.2 MT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz CLK-klasse II (W209) Cabriolet 240 2.6 MT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse AMG I (W124) Sedan 60 AMG 6.0 AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz E-klasse II (W210, S210) Facelift Sedan 280 2.8 AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) 3 door SUV 400 4.0d AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) 5 door SUV 400 4.0d AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz G-klasse II (W463) SUV (open top) 400 5.0d AT 16.1 l.

Cadillac SRX II 5 door SUV 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz R-klasse I Facelift 2 Minivan 350 3.5 AT 16.1 l.

Mercedes-Benz SL-klasse IV (R129) Facelift Roadster 320 3.2 AT 16.1 l.

Nissan 350Z I Facelift Coupe 3.5 MT 16.1 l.

Nissan 350Z I Coupe 3.5 MT 16.1 l.

Opel Omega A Sedan Lotus 3.6 MT 16.1 l.

Peugeot 406 5-door station wagon 3.0 AT 16.1 l.

Peugeot 406 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 VI (997) Facelift Cabriolet Carrera 4S 3.8 AT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 VI (997) Facelift Targa 4S 3.8 AT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 VI (997) Coupe Carrera 3.6 MT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 V (996) Facelift Targa 3.6 AT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 V (996) Facelift Targa 3.6 MT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 V (996) Facelift Coupe Carrera 3.6 AT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 V (996) Facelift Coupe Carrera 3.6 MT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 V (996) Facelift Cabriolet Carrera 3.6 AT 16.1 l.

Porsche 911 V (996) Facelift Cabriolet Carrera 3.6 MT 16.1 l.

Renault Laguna I 5-door station wagon 3.0 MT 16.1 l.

Renault Laguna I Liftbek 3.0 MT 16.1 l.

SsangYong Rexton I 5 door SUV 2.3 AT 16.1 l.

Toyota 4Runner II 3 door SUV 3.0 MT 16.1 l.

main page Compare cars
Speed ​​and acceleration Fuel consumption
The fastest Slowest The most powerful The weakest 0-100 km / h maximum 0-100 km / h minimum Fuel consumption in the city (maximum) Fuel consumption on the highway (maximum) Fuel consumption average (maximum) Fuel consumption in the city (minimum) Fuel consumption on the highway (minimum) Fuel consumption average (minimum)
Dimensions and ground clearance Trunk volume car, the fuel tank
Large width cars Narrow cars Long cars Short cars High automobiles low cars Heavy cars Lightweight cars High ground clearance Low ground clearance Fuel tank maximum The volume of the fuel tank minimum Maximum amount of trunk Trunk volume minimum
Car Specifications (Directory translated into all the languages ​​of the world).
We are not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided on the site.. Choose site language: English 2024 Automdb.com. Load on 0.0703 s. Terms of Use privacy policy Contacts
You can not add more than 3 modifications!